Can a CT Scan Detect a Concussion? What It Can—and Can’t—Tell You

Concussions are among the most frequently misunderstood injuries in sports medicine and neurological care. Despite growing awareness, confusion persists around how—or even whether—concussions can be “seen” through imaging like CT scans. For athletic trainers, physical therapists, and sports medicine professionals, this isn’t just a theoretical question. It's a practical, clinical concern that directly impacts return-to-play decisions, referrals, and athlete care protocols.

Why CT Scans Are Used in Head Trauma—But Not to Diagnose Concussion

A computed tomography (CT) scan remains one of the most widely used imaging tools in emergency medicine. It’s fast, widely available, and excellent at detecting structural brain injuries like skull fractures, hematomas, and cerebral edema. In acute trauma settings—particularly when a patient presents with loss of consciousness, vomiting, neurological deficits, or a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score below 15—CT scans help rule out serious complications that may require surgical intervention.

However, concussion is a functional brain injury, not a structural one. It involves a complex cascade of neurochemical and metabolic changes that typically occur at the cellular level. These alterations are invisible to standard CT imaging, which is why most patients with a concussion will have a normal CT scan, even when symptoms are severe.

The clinical reality is this: CT is not designed to diagnose a concussion. Its primary role is to rule out more severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) that may require immediate medical or surgical management.

The Limits of CT Scans in Concussion Diagnosis

A review published in Pediatric Radiology and available through the NIH confirms that conventional CT and MRI rarely show abnormalities in cases of concussion. The article states, “Imaging of Concussion in Young Athletes,” makes it clear that concussion remains a clinical diagnosis based on symptom evaluation, physical examination, and validated assessment tools—not imaging findings (source).

In a 2021 TRACK‑TBI sample of 1,935 patients with mild traumatic brain injury, certain CT features—like contusions, subdural or subarachnoid hemorrhage—were found in a subset and were statistically linked to poorer 12‑month outcomes. This highlights that while a CT scan may identify complications in a subset of more severe cases (often referred to clinically as “complicated” concussions), it still doesn't detect the primary features of a typical concussion.

Objective Concussion Assessments

Anytime, Anywhere

Sway’s FDA-cleared mobile app provides fast, reliable testing for athletic trainers and healthcare professionals.

Advanced Imaging in Concussion Research

While standard CT scans remain limited in detecting concussions, advanced imaging methods are offering deeper insights into how the brain is affected after injury. One of the most studied tools in concussion research is diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)—a type of MRI that maps the brain’s white matter tracts. DTI can detect subtle disruptions in axonal integrity, which are often present after mild traumatic brain injury but invisible on traditional scans.

Research using DTI has shown measurable changes in brain connectivity and microstructural integrity in individuals with concussion-related symptoms. Studies have also explored techniques like functional MRI (fMRI), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to evaluate changes in brain activity, blood flow, and metabolic function after head trauma.

These tools are helping researchers better understand the physiological effects of concussion. However, they are not currently part of routine clinical care due to cost, availability, and variability in interpretation. For now, these modalities remain valuable in research settings—and they continue to shape the future of how we understand and eventually diagnose concussion-related brain changes.

Clinical Application: When Is a CT Scan Warranted?

For healthcare professionals, the decision to order a CT scan after head trauma should follow established clinical decision rules, such as the Canadian CT Head Rule or the New Orleans Criteria. These tools guide practitioners in determining whether the patient’s presentation warrants imaging.

Typical indicators include:

  • Prolonged loss of consciousness
  • Seizure activity
  • Signs of skull fracture (e.g., raccoon eyes, Battle’s sign)
  • Persistent vomiting
  • Focal neurological deficits
  • Age over 65 or suspected coagulopathy

A patient with isolated symptoms such as headache, dizziness, and confusion—but no high-risk features—may not require a CT scan, especially in sports medicine or outpatient settings. As outlined in Medscape’s concussion workup guidelines, abnormalities are relatively rare in these populations (approximately 9–13%) and do not alter management in most cases (source).

What a “Normal” CT Scan Can—and Can’t—Tell You

For patients, families, and sometimes even coaches, a normal CT scan can lead to misconceptions. A clean scan does not mean the brain is uninjured. It simply means there is no evidence of structural damage—like bleeding or fractures—at a level detectable by the scanner.

This distinction matters. In persistent concussion symptom cases, where patients experience ongoing headaches, dizziness, or cognitive issues weeks or months after injury, CT scans often remain normal. Yet these individuals are experiencing very real symptoms driven by functional and physiological disruptions, which CT technology is not designed to detect.

An article from Cognitive FX emphasizes that standard imaging cannot detect functional brain changes, unlike advanced techniques such as functional MRI (fNCI), SPECT, or PET scans, which have shown greater promise in identifying altered brain activity in concussion patients (source).

Real-World Scenario: CT Use in Sideline and Clinical Decisions

Consider an athletic trainer working a Friday night football game. A running back takes a helmet-to-helmet hit and walks to the sideline with dizziness and confusion. He has no red-flag symptoms and recovers orientation within a few minutes. In this scenario, clinical assessment tools like SCAT6 and balance testing are appropriate. A CT scan is not indicated unless his symptoms escalate.

Now consider a different case: a basketball player falls, strikes her head, and loses consciousness for 45 seconds before vomiting. She’s slow to respond and demonstrates right-side weakness. This athlete should be referred to the ED for immediate CT imaging—not to assess for concussion, but to rule out a life-threatening intracranial injury.

These examples underscore that CT use is driven by clinical presentation and risk—not by a desire to “confirm” a concussion diagnosis.

What This Means for Athlete Care

CT scans serve a vital role in acute injury evaluation, especially when serious intracranial injuries are a concern. However, in typical concussion cases—especially in youth and sports-related settings—they provide little value in isolation. The absence of imaging findings does not mean the brain is functioning normally.

Understanding this allows healthcare professionals to educate athletes, families, and coaches more effectively, ensuring expectations align with current science. It also reinforces the importance of multidisciplinary care—from athletic trainers performing sideline evaluations to physical therapists guiding vestibular rehab and physicians coordinating long-term management.